CRA denies incapacity declare to lady who’s allergic to fragrance


Jamie Golombek: A number of chemical sensitivity may be debilitating, however taxpayer did not get the right medical certificates

Article content material

The incapacity tax credit score (DTC) is a non-refundable tax credit score that’s supposed to acknowledge the impression of varied non-itemizable, disability-related prices. For 2024, the worth of the federal credit score is $1,481, however add the provincial or territorial tax financial savings, and the mixed annual worth may be value as much as $3,169, relying on the place you reside.

To qualify, it’s essential to full the Canada Income Company’s Kind T2201, Incapacity Tax Credit score Certificates, upon which a medical practitioner should certify that you’ve got a “extreme and extended impairment in bodily or psychological operate.” As soon as the shape is accomplished, it’s despatched to the CRA, which can both approve the DTC or deny it. In case your software is denied, you possibly can attraction the CRA’s resolution to the Tax Courtroom, which is strictly what occurred in a latest tax case determined late final month.

Commercial 2

Article content material

The taxpayer, a highschool historical past instructor, was recognized with a number of chemical sensitivity (MCS) a number of years in the past. Because of this situation, she has a excessive diploma of sensitivity to quite a few triggers, together with most perfumes, bleaches, chlorine swimming pools, gases, cosmetics and hand sanitizers. She went to courtroom to attraction the CRA’s resolution that she was not eligible for the DTC for the 2022 taxation 12 months.

Article content material

The taxpayer testified that she has suffered with MCS for quite a lot of years, first turning into conscious of the situation in 2011, when her medical practitioner talked about it as a attainable rationalization for a collapsed lung she had suffered. She mentioned that, on the time, a analysis of MCS was very uncommon, however she has since acquired affirmation of this analysis from different medical practitioners.

She additionally testified that publicity to the triggers listed above may be debilitating and even life-threatening because of anaphylactic reactions that result in full or partial closing of her throat. These reactions severely limit her means to breathe, stroll and converse till she will be able to escape from the triggering substance. She estimated she has skilled anaphylaxis 20 to 30 occasions in her lifetime.

Article content material

Commercial 3

Article content material

The taxpayer mentioned her MCS has a big impact on her every day dwelling, with the one efficient remedy being to keep away from chemical triggers. She mentioned the time that she has to spend retaining her surroundings protected is “overwhelming,” requiring lodging for the whole lot to maintain her protected.

For instance, as a way to be vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19, she needed to make particular preparations to obtain the vaccination outside to keep away from the hand sanitizers that might in any other case be utilized by each sufferers and medical workers on the clinic. She additionally has to make comparable preparations to get blood work, requiring home-care suppliers to return to her personal residence to attract the blood. Equally, she has a dental hygienist who does dwelling visits to keep away from the scents usually present in a dental workplace.

The taxpayer additionally described the lodging which were made by her employer in order that she will be able to proceed to show. For instance, her faculty has instituted a scent-free coverage for workers and college students, and her time is principally spent aiding college students concerned in e-learning packages. She wears a masks when in school to scale back the danger of publicity.

Commercial 4

Article content material

She testified that MCS is “a everlasting situation,” which she’s had for about 20 years, and she or he expects to undergo from it for the remainder of her life.

To qualify for the DTC below the Earnings Tax Act, a person should have a number of extreme and extended impairments in bodily or psychological features, the consequences of which have to be such that the person’s means to carry out a number of primary actions of every day dwelling have to be markedly restricted. As well as, the person should present a medical practitioner’s certificates, the T2201, certifying that every of those two necessities has been met.

The certificates is comprised of two components. Half A, the “Particular person’s part,” is 2 pages lengthy and captures the taxpayer’s figuring out info. Half B, the “Medical practitioner’s part,” includes pages 3 to 16, on which the medical practitioner certifies and describes how the consequences of the taxpayer’s impairment(s) “markedly limit the making use of particular person’s primary actions of every day dwelling.”

The issue on this case was that the taxpayer’s medical practitioner didn’t embody pages 3 by way of 14. When requested about this, the taxpayer mentioned, “They don’t mirror … that I’ve operate besides when uncovered to chemical compounds. And so these pages didn’t apply to the chemical publicity wants that I’ve.”

Commercial 5

Article content material

The taxpayer’s T2201 did, nevertheless, embody pages 15 and 16, which had been accomplished by her medical practitioner and indicated that her situation was “a lifelong persistent medical sickness.” However the medical practitioner didn’t describe or certify how her means “to carry out primary actions of every day dwelling is markedly restricted.”

Prior jurisprudence has concluded that as a way to qualify for the DTC, the certificates should specify the exercise or actions of every day dwelling which might be impaired and which might be restricted. On this case, the certificates clearly confirmed the taxpayer’s situation was extreme and extended, however it didn’t present the mandatory certification with respect to the consequences of such a extreme and extended situation.

Really useful from Editorial

“Though I’m sympathetic to the acute measures which the (taxpayer) should incorporate into and undertake as a part of her every day dwelling to keep away from publicity to a big record of chemical compounds so prevalent in our trendy society, a certificates signed by a medical practitioner which doesn’t present certification as to the consequences of the (taxpayer’s) situation” just isn’t a sound certificates,” the choose concluded.

The choose, subsequently, dominated that the taxpayer didn’t qualify for the DTC.

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.


For those who appreciated this story, join extra within the FP Investor publication.


Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s essential to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters right here.

Article content material

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *